Back to platform

How we work with sources

The breed carries family memory, photographs, and retellings. This page explains what TAZY.DOG can state with confidence, what needs a clear qualification, and how a reader can help correct a page.

A fact starts with somewhere a reader can check it

For the standard, that is the original FCI document. For an event date, it is an organiser’s publication or an official result. For a historical account, it is an archive object, publication, or testimony with a clear provenance. A retelling without an author, date, or link can suggest a question; it is not evidence.

Open FCI Standard No. 372

A photograph shows a moment; it does not prove an entire history

We credit the author, source, and licence of documentary photography. A single picture can support that a particular scene was photographed in a particular place and time; it cannot establish a dog’s ancestry, a long tradition, or health outside the frame. When rights or context are unclear, we do not publish the image.

A public page is neither a private dossier nor veterinary advice

TAZY.DOG keeps only material safe for open reading: published sources, editorial explanation, and agreed public information. Contacts, documents, drafts, reviewer notes, and the internal review history do not enter the page, search index, or metadata.

What changes when a correction arrives

We do not silently rewrite a page. A verifiable source can change the wording, link, or boundary of a conclusion; unverified material remains clearly qualified or is not published. If you spot an error, send a link, document, or context – not another person’s private information.

Suggest a source or correction